these 11 fairly basic bugs in interpreting C code, and it undoubtedly
When Linus reimplemented UNIX, writing the Linux kernel, the situation was somewhat more complicated, with an additional layer of indirection. He was exposed to UNIX just as a user, but, apparently, had no access to the source code of UNIX. On the other hand, he was massively exposed to the Minix source code (an implementation of UNIX, but using a microkernel), and to the book describing such implementation as well. But, in turn, when Tanenbaum wrote Minix, he did so after being massively exposed to the UNIX source code. So, SCO (during the IBM litigation) had a hard time trying to claim that Linux contained any protected expressions. Yet, when Linus used Minix as an inspiration, not only was he very familiar with something (Minix) implemented with knowledge of the UNIX code, but (more interestingly) the license of Minix was restrictive, it became open source only in 2000. Still, even in such a setup, Tanenbaum protested about the architecture (in the famous exchange), not about copyright infringement. So, we could reasonably assume Tanenbaum considered rewrites fair, even if Linus was exposed to Minix (and having himself followed a similar process when writing Minix).，更多细节参见新收录的资料
AP could not independently verify the figures.。新收录的资料是该领域的重要参考
DECSTBM doesn’t work because of our unicode half-block shenanigans. We’re squeezing two pixels into each terminal character, and so we want to be able to “scroll” in half-pixels; our scroll needs to turn lower half blocks into upper half blocks when we’re moving vertically. That operation just doesn’t exist.。新收录的资料对此有专业解读