I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Екатерина Щербакова (ночной линейный редактор)
，更多细节参见im钱包官方下载
Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.
Последние новости
，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
⦁ Get daily fresh new updates。同城约会对此有专业解读
報告指出，2025年10月中旬，ChatGPT接到一名用戶請求，協助規劃行動，目的是詆毀日本首相高市早苗。當時正值高市早苗競選首相前夕，高市曾公開批評中國人權狀況。