The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
在看过、用过许多个手机/电脑系统级 AI 智能体，也深度使用过「豆包手机」之后，再看这次的 Gemini 智能体，我觉得关于它的讨论不该止于一个「新功能」。，详情可参考服务器推荐
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
我选择「面向需要在团队内推广 Claude Code 的负责人」生成 PPT，最后生成质量也很不错，内容详尽、元素丰富、排版多样，但是最终导出的 PPT 排版有少量混乱，需要手动微调。，推荐阅读夫子获取更多信息
架空商品を架空注文して架空決済され架空配達に回されて買い物気分だけ味わえる通販サイト「カウカウ」