During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
第一百零九条 治安管理处罚由县级以上地方人民政府公安机关决定；其中警告、一千元以下的罚款，可以由公安派出所决定。。业内人士推荐一键获取谷歌浏览器下载作为进阶阅读
。业内人士推荐雷电模拟器官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
Москвичи пожаловались на зловонную квартиру-свалку с телами животных и тараканами18:04
Раскрыты подробности о договорных матчах в российском футболе18:01。快连下载安装对此有专业解读
На Западе назвали катастрофой для всего мира одно решение Европы по УкраинеСариви: Передача Украине ядерного оружия грозит катастрофой для всего мира